Title 1: “Serological analysis for the detection HeBin pregnant women in EAC: a comparison with culture background.
Good title because: Type of study is Clear and title words is less than 20 words. Outcome is clear Detection HeBin. Participants are Pregnant women in EAC. Intervention is Serology analysis. The Comparison is Culture background.
N.B: The abbreviation should be explained before or avoided.
Title 2: Rapid emergence of in-vitro resistance to ampicillin and cotrimoxazole in Shigella dysenteries typed from Musanze.”
Bad title because: Participants: Not mentioned
Title 3: “Risk factors of stunting among U5 children in Bugesera district”.
Good title because:
Type of study is Clear and title words is less than 20 words, the outcome is Risk factors of stunting, participants are U5 children location is Bugesera. No intervention because is cross-sectional study
N.B: The abbreviation should be explained before or avoided.
Title 4: “Report of an assessment into poor hygiene behavior as a reason for the acquisition of diarrhea by some minority in living in slams in Kenya”
Bad title because
- Type of study: No clear type of study. The title is more than 20 words.
- Outcome is: Reason for the acquisition of diarrhea
- Participants are not specific (some minority)
- Intervention: No intervention
Comparison: No comparison.
•Title 5: “We should stop using formula milk to treat malnutrition in premature babies”
Bad title:
Type of study is not Clear, no comparison group, no location. We have only Intervention, outcomes and participants.