This is good study title: “Risk factors of stunting among U5 children in bugesera district” the type of study is cross sectional based population study, the outcome identifying risk factors of stunting in Rwanda, Participants U5 Children, Intervention: none there is no intervention to be conducted; Comparison: It won’t use comparison as it is cross section study and its none experimental study. The ords are limited as are less than 20.
This is good study title: “Serological analysis for the detection HeB in pregnant women in EAC: A comparison with culture background” the type of experimental comparative study, the outcome Detection for HeB, Participants Pregnant women, Intervention: Serological analysis Comparison : Culture background.
This is bad study title : “We should stop using formula milk to treat mal nutrition in premature babies “ The type of study : not clear , The outcome: not specified, not clear , participants : premature babies , Intervention: not clear , comparison : not mentioned .
This is bad study title : “Report of an assessment into poor hygiene behavior as reason for the acquisition of diarrhea by some minority in living in slams in kenya “ the title is too long , not concise , there is too much words: The type of study : not clear , The outcome: not specified, not clear , participants : The population not specified, its too broad. , Intervention: none , comparison : none
This is bad study title : “Rapid emergency of in-vitro resistence to ampicillin and cotrimoxazole in shigella dysenteries typed from musanze “: The type of study : Experimental study The outcome: not specified, not clear , participants : The population not specified,, Intervention: in-vitro resistence , comparison : not clear