Criteria 1: The description of the topic well described.
The Author shows the problem which will be addressed by the research and stated that there is Shortages of qualified human resources for health are particularly acute in low-income countries, which face significant burdens of disease and mortality continue by described how the problem affect especially in targeted population by reporting that in 2010, 7.6 million children died before reaching their fifth birthday worldwide, and in Africa, almost three fourths (73.2%) of the under-5 mortalities were due to preventable infectious causes, including pneumonia, diarrhoea, and malaria [1]. Specific target population is children under five years. The writer identified well the what is the scope of the problem where reported that Skilled health worker shortages are among the reasons that impede access to treatment, but it has been found that effective and inexpensive interventions for these diseases can be delivered by community health workers (CHWs) [2].
Criteria 2: Summary of existing knowledge well described.
The Autor managed to do a good summary on existing knowledge showing the importance of having CHWs in the community and their main roles on implementation of interventions of children of 5 years, continue to show burden of diseases and mortality rate of children under five years in Rwanda. The Autor were selective and starting from general to the specific information related to the study.
Criteria 3: Purpose of your study well described.
The purpose of the study is clear stated “This study aims to qualitatively evaluate the CHW system in Rwanda from the perspective of CHWs themselves, as well as their beneficiaries. Moreover, the study seeks to identify factors and challenges that impact the CHW system and can inform system improvements.
Criteria 4: Description of your study not clear.
The Autor specify the location of the study which is Rwanda, but the date of the study, methodological approach and rationale of its use, investigators and sponsoring institutions, size or range of the study, citation of previous publications or pilot studies were not mentioned. Therefore, the description of the study was not clear stated in Introduction.
Criteria 5: Contextual information not started.
Not mentioned in the background.
Criteria 6: Potential impact well described.
The shows the potential impact of having Community Health workers in Society. Effective CHW case management has been linked to the level of training, transport means, adequate supervision, access to medicines and educational tools, and sufficient incentives [7-11]. Barriers, however, can reduce effectiveness of CHW service delivery, including inadequate training, supervision, and remuneration, as well as insufficient assimilation of CHWs into the health system [12,13].