How to write a scientific paper
According to the author, it is not easy to be in line with science and write good paper when your frequent publications intend to get job and money. Robert schulman described the publication of papers as framework for some scientist to get money from government and universities. For this reason they try to shape the introduction so make it attracting for readers, moreover these scientist intend to get cited or just cite the friends/relatives, then get known in scientific community. For this group of scientist discovering something new does not matter, the essential is grant. However, to win grant requires an amazing application where discovering incredibly fundamental thing is highlighted. Being credible to the founder a condition is to cited in many publications and be on the author list. Once the project is funded regardless of misusing received grant the researcher will publish anyway. At the presentation step, the research do not care about presenting the negative or positive results, important is to keep trusted by taking enough time to prepare very good presentation. After paper submission, researcher pays much attention on reporting back the recommendation in respect of editor’s deadline. At this level junior scientists leave the process because their manuscripts are taken at growing level until they collapse. As means of presenting errata researcher try to do this as new paper, with the purpose of being cited once more. Conclusion is an easy step because it simply requires manipulating tense from abstract and then mentioning at least on relevant theory in line with the experiment.
For this author the main idea was to describe bad manuscript writers
Why writing? Writing to stay in scientific community, win grant, get job and money.
How to write a scientific manuscript for publication
It has been clearly revealed that the scientific journals and manuscript started from 1665 in England and France. It was complicated till the second half of 19th century. When the method description became fully developed and comprehensively organized from letter to theory-experiment-discussion. A lot of measures were gradually put in place for standardization of manuscript writing and development and arrived at IMRAD(introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion) for uniform requirement of editorial rules, and be submitted to biomedical journals. The uniform requirement were to be released by international committee if medical journal editors(ICMJE). And a group of scientists and editors developed consolidated standard of reporting randomized controlled Trials (RCT) and strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE). They put in place checklist of numerous items which highlights Title, abstract introduction, methods, results discussion and other information sections of article. This is mainly to provide guidance to authors on how to improve the reporting of observational studies. This approach is widely supported by reviewers, growing number of journal editors, readers. That is guidance on how journal can be organized
The main idea of this author was to describe the structure of good manuscript, in structured process
Why writing? This author shows that writing is for growing scientifically, develop skills and knowledge on structured manuscript writing, and moreover contribute to improvement of domain.